<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily SG: 8 Jul 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/</link>
	<description>What everyone is talking about</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tester</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=505#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>I don't believe they are anti the bloggers GRP etc. From what I can see they seem to regard the Internet like the question of antartica.perhaps article 75,to 80?of the UN charter?If that is the case they do not even believe our govt has a right to regulating the net as well? Care to clarify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe they are anti the bloggers GRP etc. From what I can see they seem to regard the Internet like the question of antartica.perhaps article 75,to 80?of the UN charter?If that is the case they do not even believe our govt has a right to regulating the net as well? Care to clarify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinkerton</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>pinkerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=505#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Lets not stray away from the main discussion and end up confusing everyone. Lest everyone loses sight of what's really at the core. If Darkness was really sincere about the welfare of our net, he will work with the Dr C.George. Dr B.Leong and others like Tan Tarn How, from the Institute of Policy Studies.

It's very clear reading what he and others have writtten concerning this subject of deregulation, the others definitely have a professional working knowledge of how to make all this work. Maybe they gained alot of experience in their gaming or maybe it is just due to having to juggle so many things with very little resources, but I am certain they know how to swing it. I have never ever doubted their capacity to contribute. And I have even publicly stated this for all. That I believe no one in the net disputes either. The problem here is the others all seem to listen to this one Darkness blindly without ever bothering to use their brains independently. 

Let me tell you his plan. All Darkness is interested to do is show the whole wide world how stupid those who have proposed this whole idea are. I can even prove it. For example in the last two articles which Dotty and some other read club members wrote http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/the-incredible-unlikeness-of-being-of-the-sedition-act-%e2%80%93-a-critique-on-%e2%80%9cderegulating-the-net%e2%80%9d-part-2/

Tell me why wasn't this highlighted to the group bfr the question and answer session? There is no doubt in my mind this people definitely have the brain power to make this whole idea work. They are simply not interested to help any of us. If those sort of info was forwarded to the grouping. I am sure it would have been factored into the whole plan to make it much better. Instead what we see here is a deliberate plan to trip us all up by strategically releasing information only "after" and not "before." I have notice the brotherhood never ever give out info that can be gainfully used. It seems they do not seem to want to share information or to even work with others in blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not stray away from the main discussion and end up confusing everyone. Lest everyone loses sight of what&#8217;s really at the core. If Darkness was really sincere about the welfare of our net, he will work with the Dr C.George. Dr B.Leong and others like Tan Tarn How, from the Institute of Policy Studies.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very clear reading what he and others have writtten concerning this subject of deregulation, the others definitely have a professional working knowledge of how to make all this work. Maybe they gained alot of experience in their gaming or maybe it is just due to having to juggle so many things with very little resources, but I am certain they know how to swing it. I have never ever doubted their capacity to contribute. And I have even publicly stated this for all. That I believe no one in the net disputes either. The problem here is the others all seem to listen to this one Darkness blindly without ever bothering to use their brains independently. </p>
<p>Let me tell you his plan. All Darkness is interested to do is show the whole wide world how stupid those who have proposed this whole idea are. I can even prove it. For example in the last two articles which Dotty and some other read club members wrote <a href="http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/the-incredible-unlikeness-of-being-of-the-sedition-act-%e2%80%93-a-critique-on-%e2%80%9cderegulating-the-net%e2%80%9d-part-2/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound//dotseng.wordpress.com');" rel="nofollow">http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/the-incredible-unlikeness-of-being-of-the-sedition-act-%e2%80%93-a-critique-on-%e2%80%9cderegulating-the-net%e2%80%9d-part-2/</a></p>
<p>Tell me why wasn&#8217;t this highlighted to the group bfr the question and answer session? There is no doubt in my mind this people definitely have the brain power to make this whole idea work. They are simply not interested to help any of us. If those sort of info was forwarded to the grouping. I am sure it would have been factored into the whole plan to make it much better. Instead what we see here is a deliberate plan to trip us all up by strategically releasing information only &#8220;after&#8221; and not &#8220;before.&#8221; I have notice the brotherhood never ever give out info that can be gainfully used. It seems they do not seem to want to share information or to even work with others in blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singaporedaily</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>singaporedaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=505#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>Thanks Elia Diodati, the catty one always has a place here ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Elia Diodati, the catty one always has a place here ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elia Diodati</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/07/08/daily-sg-8-jul-2008/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Elia Diodati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=505#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, as always. Molly Meek also has &lt;a href="http://mollymeek.livejournal.com/193509.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;something to say&lt;/a&gt; about Glass Castle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, as always. Molly Meek also has <a href="http://mollymeek.livejournal.com/193509.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound//mollymeek.livejournal.com');" rel="nofollow">something to say</a> about Glass Castle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
