<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Apologising and Aims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/</link>
	<description>2009 and beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: that</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>that</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>The fucked face was laughing HER HEAD OFF like Lee Hsien Loong:

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p408/bluediamond888/bigshoes.jpg

I prefer to see her BLOODY HEAD roll...on the floor :-)

2011, don't forget the likes of these PAP dogs: their no-mercy for Singaporeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fucked face was laughing HER HEAD OFF like Lee Hsien Loong:</p>
<p><a href="http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p408/bluediamond888/bigshoes.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p408/bluediamond888/bigshoes.jpg</a></p>
<p>I prefer to see her BLOODY HEAD roll&#8230;on the floor :-)</p>
<p>2011, don&#8217;t forget the likes of these PAP dogs: their no-mercy for Singaporeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Sue Yu</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Sue Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>Lao LEE
Mini LEE
LEE Bee Wah

you get the drift......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lao LEE<br />
Mini LEE<br />
LEE Bee Wah</p>
<p>you get the drift&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singaporedaily</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>singaporedaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>@ Agagooga 

Weekends bo eng lah. No break will burn out fast. Not to mention its much more enjoyable to surf the net when you're at work *.^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Agagooga </p>
<p>Weekends bo eng lah. No break will burn out fast. Not to mention its much more enjoyable to surf the net when you&#8217;re at work *.^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanged</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>hanged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>geez,you guys don't understand team work do you? one for all, all for one. even losers do the same and group for a stupid cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geez,you guys don&#8217;t understand team work do you? one for all, all for one. even losers do the same and group for a stupid cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurricane Gustav</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurricane Gustav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>Let's face it. For all we know, the solution could be staring us directly in the face. 

The problem is none of us in blogosphere are pooling our resources and directing it to one gainful purpose. The way I see it. AIMS has proposed many things. Some of them I dare say are red herrings such as the idea to abolish 100 symbolic sites. But it is still difficult to make out the trees from the forest. 

The problem is none of us have any strategic planning experience. So when we all look at the proposal it just looks like alot of ideas. But to planners, they would know how "A" fits into "B" and so on and so forth, so they will shoot down the likeliest and ignore the phantom fishes. They know how to prioritize, disregard and categorize in terms of relative importance. Its a skill.

Lets face it. The only people who have the experiential knowledge to render the situation have decided to fold their arms and say, we dont want to get involved. For whatever reason? They dont even tell us why!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It looks like a boycott, but I believe one reason why they are so amblivalent is they have already successfully shot down the whole IC3 idea of community moderation. 

So in their accounts, its a done deal. That was really what they were concerned about. 

This also leads me to one conclusion, they may have entered a pact of silence to look the other way.

We are alone.

Nice site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it. For all we know, the solution could be staring us directly in the face. </p>
<p>The problem is none of us in blogosphere are pooling our resources and directing it to one gainful purpose. The way I see it. AIMS has proposed many things. Some of them I dare say are red herrings such as the idea to abolish 100 symbolic sites. But it is still difficult to make out the trees from the forest. </p>
<p>The problem is none of us have any strategic planning experience. So when we all look at the proposal it just looks like alot of ideas. But to planners, they would know how &#8220;A&#8221; fits into &#8220;B&#8221; and so on and so forth, so they will shoot down the likeliest and ignore the phantom fishes. They know how to prioritize, disregard and categorize in terms of relative importance. Its a skill.</p>
<p>Lets face it. The only people who have the experiential knowledge to render the situation have decided to fold their arms and say, we dont want to get involved. For whatever reason? They dont even tell us why!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It looks like a boycott, but I believe one reason why they are so amblivalent is they have already successfully shot down the whole IC3 idea of community moderation. </p>
<p>So in their accounts, its a done deal. That was really what they were concerned about. </p>
<p>This also leads me to one conclusion, they may have entered a pact of silence to look the other way.</p>
<p>We are alone.</p>
<p>Nice site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>that</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>that face (with the quavering voice) looks like it's begging to be punched by....

Mr Anthony Lee &#38; Lao Lee &#38; Mini Lee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that face (with the quavering voice) looks like it&#8217;s begging to be punched by&#8230;.</p>
<p>Mr Anthony Lee &amp; Lao Lee &amp; Mini Lee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlooker</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>No cure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No cure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agagooga</title>
		<link>http://singaporedaily.net/2008/08/31/of-apologising-and-aims/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Agagooga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://singaporedaily.net/?p=606#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Something I just realised: you don't aggregate posts written on weekends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I just realised: you don&#8217;t aggregate posts written on weekends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
