The Singapore Daily

What everyone is talking about


Daily SG: 24 Mar 2009

Posted by singaporedaily on March 24th, 2009

Film’s Act
- Martyn See: New restrictions to Films Act introduced in the guise of liberalisation
- TOC: A bad law just got worse
- Sgpolitics: The new Public Order Act — more arbitrary powers, more tyranny
- Singapore Alternatives: PAP Cha Cha - One Step Forward Three Steps Back
- Workers’ Party: Films Amendment Bill
- TOC: New Films Act restrictions [News Vid]

We Don’t Need No Regulation
- Simple is the Reason of My Heart: The Many Faces of Moderation in Internet
- Geekonomics: Can the Internet be self-regulated? [Thanks Nic]

The Passing of Dr Allan Ooi
- Singapore Enquirer: A call for setting up of a Commission of Inquiry to investigate the circumstances leading to Dr Allan Ooi’s suicide
- Wayang Party: More than meets the eye behind MINDEF’s explanation of Dr Allan Ooi’s bond
- The Sun Shines on Singapore: Mindef Speaks, All Listen
- Everyday’s Life in a Snapshot: Hey, Straits Times, where’s the gaming addiction now?

Recession
- Blowin’ In The Wind: The ascent of money
- My Little Corner: Inflation is up 1.9%

The Gospel of Harry | Dialects are for Stupids
- The boy who knew too much: The mysteries of Singlish

SG Press rank 140 and falling
- A Xeno Boy in Sg: A Cup of Sg Tea

General Elections 2009
- The Void Deck: From the Horses’ Mouths: PAP MPs’ Shortcomings

Re education
- The Kent Ridge Common: Rethinking the term “elitism”

Daily Discourse
- catherinelim.sg: “Who’s afraid of Catherine Lim?”
- TOC: Change has come to S’pore

Life, the universe and everything
- AngryAngMo: Singapore’s Best Burger - Here Are The 5 Best Places (With Pics)
- Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Multi-touch Interactive Table at Noise Singapore

14 Responses to “Daily SG: 24 Mar 2009”

  1. soojenn Says:

    Is there something wrong with the link to the Wayang Party article or has the Wayang Party website crashed…

    Clicking on te link shows:
    “Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage”

    Interesting… very interesting. Either they have too much traffic or the site has been sabotagued.

  2. Singaporedaddy Says:

    We dont want to go to war, but if we have too; we will not hesitate to do so. Wayangparty is our ally. We are simple folk, we are men who keep to our word - we do NOT flip flop, neither do we fear - why is wayangparty.com inaccessible?

    I think the people who wish to declare war with wayang should think long and hard about whether they wish to declare war with us as well; we can be useful and helpful; why cause trouble?

    Think! I have ordered our totenkopft, Germania and Ottoman units to find out what has happened to WP. These are the best technocrats along with perhaps 8 other channel partners to drill down and find out how this happened.

    Think!

    It is best if everything returns back to normal.

    SD (Internet liaison officer of the brotherhood)

  3. Singaporedaddy Says:

    Think? What if we pulled out every gaming site from SG?

    Think?

    Do you fear peace more than war?

    Good. We understand each other.

    SD (Internet liaison officer of the brotherhood)

  4. soojenn Says:

    I suggest for the Singaporedaily which is apparently neutral and provides the link to “What everybody is talking about, also provide links to the pro establishment website, like the Young PAP Blog at http://p65.sg/ - “It’s Where We Talk” to provide a contrast to what these people write, in comparison to what we get from various other blogs like the Wayang Party, Singapore Enquirer, etc..

    It must be some kind of joke to read what these people write, like from Baey Yam Keng on “Marriage & Kids”.

    The government wants to engage the citizens in te new media… with such a pathetic bunch of YPAP? They should perhaps take some lessons from The Brotherhood, Yawning Bread, and even Wayang Partyto get a tip or two on how to blog, and then possibly engage the netizens.

  5. Touche Says:

    brotherhood engage with netizens???? hahahaha u gotta be jokin. who the hell reads them? Only singaporedaddy i suppose. since he’s the one who writes all those trash anyway.

    Singaporedaddy the One Man Show.

  6. haha Says:

    sure, we all believe you touche. One man can squeeze the whole wide world into his head.

    http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/diplomacy-is-way-ahead-of-community-moderation-what-aims-should-have-known/

    Really want to know who is the one man show?

  7. Touche Says:

    Haha-SIngaporedaddy :) deluded people like u do.

    From Daily SG: 24 Mar 2009, 2009/03/25 at 7:22 AM:
    You could be right haha, but I really dont have any idea how to deal with them any other way.
    We tried to label them as crazies. That didnt work. Then we tried to hit their credibility. That made them only stronger. Then we tried to hit their content and they said, we dont seek to be credible.
    So lets try calling them delusional

    From Daily SG: 24 Mar 2009, 2009/03/25 at 7:29 AM:
    As you can see. They seem to be winning all the time. So what do you really expect us all to do hahaha?
    Btw 6.36 is a fake. I didnt write that. But this real :)
    c what I mean :)

    [consol]

  8. Wen Says:

    I agree. Brotherhood is crap. They all seem to be deluded nonsense coming from this Singaporedaddy. And this deluded guy trolls around for attention. POOR SOD!

  9. NEW ARTICLE BROTHERHOOD PRESS Says:

    Get the latest from the brotherhood press. Dont bother about Wen, Touche and the rest. They have put here just to create the right atmosphere.

    http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/diplomacy-is-way-ahead-of-community-moderation-what-aims-should-have-known/

  10. Touche Says:

    Lets give him a hug :) he deserves one :) besides I am only 16 years old :)

  11. great eggs Says:

    good or bad
    when you rock, you sometimes suck
    perspectives, alternatives
    at times, mere conjectures

  12. Touche Says:

    We may not see eye to eye, but even I have to agree to this :) give him a hug :) remember, I am only 16 years old.

    March 25th, 2009 at 1:48 am
    I suggest for the Singaporedaily which is apparently neutral and provides the link to “What everybody is talking about, also provide links to the pro establishment website, like the Young PAP Blog at http://p65.sg/ - “It’s Where We Talk” to provide a contrast to what these people write, in comparison to what we get from various other blogs like the Wayang Party, Singapore Enquirer, etc..

    It must be some kind of joke to read what these people write, like from Baey Yam Keng on “Marriage & Kids”.

    The government wants to engage the citizens in te new media… with such a pathetic bunch of YPAP? They should perhaps take some lessons from The Brotherhood, Yawning Bread, and even Wayang Partyto get a tip or two on how to blog, and then possibly engage the netizen

  13. soojenn Says:

    Well, to each his own….. if it is a one manshow, so be it. At the least it is chuning out entertaining articles, bringing to light issues of the Singapores, and not the same old drivel and most of the time fallacies & inaccuracies like the MSM on most issues except in relation to the one old man.

    The issue here is not the Brotherhood…. I suggested to give space to some pathetic YPAP, so that all the netizens can also have a read and get possibly entertained? by their scholarlistic writings? and they can a fair share on the same platform.

  14. why not reveal? Says:

    Strange that wayang party is claiming that the ISD knows who they are, and yet choose to remain anonymous.

    You see, if the ISD knows who they are, why not just reveal their names in public? What have they to hide?

    Considering they’re going on about public accountability, they should try showing some accountability themselves, no?

    I have a theory about who they are, and some evidence is beginning to come in that they might be linked to Chia Ti Lik…wasn’t he the one who referred Po the Panda to Wayang Party?

    Why would a lawyer refer his client to be interviewed by people he didn’t personally know?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>