Daily SG: 25 Mar 2009
Film’s Act
- TOC: An affront to Singapore’s history
- the kent ridge common: What’s in a name? That which we call a truth?
- Sam’s thoughts: Films Act: Let us embrace ambiguity
- Singabloodypore: PAP: Not even one
- The Brotherhood: Diplomacy vs Community Moderation – a better tomorrow for our net
- My sketchbook: More muscles to the Films Act
The Gospel of Harry | Dialects are for Stupids
- Singapore in General: Dialects – The Mysteries of Singlish [Thanks soojenn]
- Wikipedia: Singlish [Thanks soojenn]
Parliament 2009
- Wayang Party: Important questions not raised during recent Parliamentary sittings
Khaw wants to ship me to another country when I get old
- TOC: JB nursing homes – MOH clarifies
Human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Singapore
- Blowin’ In the Wind: Human rights: Universal or evolutionary?
Strangers in a Strange Land
- Toadjuice: Serangoon Gardens dorm may begin operations in August
We Don’t Need No Regulation
- Wayang Party: Reasons behind site shutdown
- Wayang Party: Anonymity in cyberspace is really an illusion
Daily Discourse
- Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Celebrate marriage without balloons
- Wild Shores of Singapore: Reactions to mass balloon release
Life, the universe and everything
- Yummy BBQ Chicken Wings: Getting addicted to TED: Ideas worth spreading
- The fire in my life: Advertlets: Exposed! [Thanks Joel]
Infoblogaramous
- Singapore Entrepreneurs: 3rd Singapore Python User Group Meeting
March 25th, 2009 at 10:41 pm
Hi guys,
Have evidence that the “crash” was a fabrication to boost the ratings for WayangParty site.
Heard it from a source called “Chi* T** N**” from ISD, who’s a cousin of mine.
He said that if ISD wanted to crash Wayang Party site, they would have taken down the mirror sites too, which makes sense.
Also, the PoThePanda story’s bogus cos ISD interrogates at Whitley, never at Cantonement where ordinary criminals can recognize their faces.
March 25th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Strange that wayang party is claiming that the ISD knows who they are, and yet choose to remain anonymous.
You see, if the ISD knows who they are, why not just reveal their names in public? What have they to hide?
Considering they’re going on about public accountability, they should try showing some accountability themselves, no?
I have a theory about who they are, and some evidence is beginning to come in that they might be linked to Chia Ti Lik…wasn’t he the one who referred Po the Panda to Wayang Party?
Why would a lawyer refer his client to be interviewed by people he didn’t personally know?
March 26th, 2009 at 12:30 am
you mean that lawyer chia ti lik is involved with the Wayang Party and helping them to run it?
March 26th, 2009 at 12:33 am
if you look at all the “legaliss” that is on the wayangparty site, you will realize they have a lawyer helping them. they also regularly do posts playing him up, and as you remember he referred PoThePanda to them. if he isn’t working with them directly, he is at least is good friends with them and knows their identity…
March 26th, 2009 at 12:38 am
how about this ejay fella who is always posting wayang party links on his site. sounds like he’s part of the wayang front man…
March 26th, 2009 at 3:08 am
Crash was a fabrication? Everything is possible. What about te ISPs who couldn’t get the site up?
Why the speculation? What the interest to know te names and if they are wo you guess them to be? Why should they reveal their names in public? The interest of the netizens is perhaps to have alternative news which over time proves to be accurate and credible.
There is no necessity to challenge the authority by revealing their names. Te Gopalan Nair incident is a good example.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:29 am
soojenn can you elaborate why the gopalan incident is a good e.g.? Whether or not he reveals his name ISD can catch him right, so you claim.
The only difference is that Gopalan had the balls to reveal his name to all Singaporeans, but these wayang people who you’re waving pom pom for don’t got guts, balls, or credibility.