Loading ...
Say NO to internet regulation in Singapore.
Daily SG: 7 Apr 2009
Posted by singaporedaily on April 7th, 2009
Gahmen/GLC Bonuses
- Sgpolitics.net: The ruling party has not learnt the lessons from AIG
- Dee Kay Dot As Gee: ‘Bonus’ not a dirty word
- Diary of A Singaporean Mind: This Week is Kindness Week in Singapore
- Feed Me To The Fish: “Bonus” need not be a dirty word in Kindness Month
Recession
- empty_vessels: Of Pay and Other Matters.
- Blowin’ In The Wind: Singapore to keep unemployment below 5.2%
- Sex sells, so does Politics: So what if our own unemployment rate is rising? That shall not stop us from giving away jobs to our friends like the Philippine! [Thanks Tan]
ERPains, Trains & Automobiles
- Everyday’s Life in a Snapshot: One hundred dollar fine for..SMRT.
- TOC: PTC fines on transport companies are meaningless
We Don’t Need No Regulation
- TOC: Engaging netizens – time to come out of comfort zones, politicians
National Service
- The Kent Ridge Common: A flexible national service policy to allow our male graduates to enter the workforce early
The People vs PoThePanda
- Chia Ti Lik’s Blog: The case of PoThePanda… so far
The Aftermath of the NTU Passings
- TOC: David Widjaja’s autopsy report released, results not disclosed
Daily Discourse
- The Wayang Party: A good and competent government is no longer enough for Singaporeans
- Singaporean Skeptic: Does Sex on TV lead to more Crime?
Life, the universe and everything
- Angry Doctor: Where morality lives
- Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Birth of one more new podcast in Singapore
April 7th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
From the brotherhood press. I think its about what happened recently when wayang party exposed those internet trolls. For some reason the brotherhood seems to take issue with this. I think they may have even had a big argument with wayang.
Why even trolls deserve the right to privacy - a study on how to win all the battles and still lose the war
http://wayangparty.com/?p=7462
There are rumours saying they have pulled out of WP. As they believe it may be a PAP site.
I am just doing this as a public service for them. As they are homeless again.
Anonymouse (sigh) :)
April 7th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
OK, falling for the tease, why do they believe that it is a PAP site?
April 7th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Funny logic
Site exposing PAP trolls = the site is working for the PAP.
This guy is definitely not paid top dollar by HWMNBN.