Daily SG: 29 Oct 2009
Mainstream vs X-Stream Media | Truth, Justice, and the Singapore Way
- Diary of A Singaporean Mind: Shanmugam : Low ranking for press freedom here absurd!
- The Temasek Review: Correcting Minister Shanmugam’s misperception that Singapore is a “stable democracy”
- Singapore Dino: From credible to absurd: PAP views on press freedom ranking
- The Temasek Review: Shanmugam: Press can criticize (but will they dare to?)
The Gospel of Harry
- Asian in America: Lee Kuan Yew on Singapore, Asia and America’s place in the world
- The Campus Observer: Students disappointed with Ministerial Forum
Recession over?
- The Temasek Review: Paradox of Singapore Economic Growth: Economy has grown fast, labour income share remains dismally low
- Temasek Hedge: Top called: is the global sucker rally about to end?
Road to Perdition Election
- The Grand Moofti Speaks: Singapore’s Opposition Parties – Time for Some Backward Integration?
ERPains, Trains & Automobiles
- Hard Hitting in the Lion City: Hardly LTA’s Fault
Daily Discourse
- according2ed: In retrospect : on the Fascist state of Singapore & how it taught me to fear the BNP [Thanks Tracy]
Life, the universe and everything
- utopia8787: ypap facebook war
- LIANAIN FILMS: Because There Will Always Be Hope
Infoblogaramous
- Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Borders 30% off
October 29th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
you want to know what the RULE OF LAW is and how pervasive this SPIRIT is in our society?
my post was deleted(because of dictatorial intolerance – same spirit as those who employ violence to kill(SILENT) others for opposing them) in blogpastor when i expressed an HONEST comment in one of his post.
you decide whether it was fair comment to his condemnation of his own religious kind
my comment below which was deleted of censored from public view:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$The first principle is this: clear, biblical thinking must override secular planning and a corporate mentality. And the imperative? Think spiritually! However well-organized our churches become, we must give priority to biblical rather than to secular thinking. In the first-century church, there were no secular organizational structures or church politics. There was no guru of authority or “chairman” of anything. There were no power grabs from control freaks. There were no personal maneuverings, infightings, financial squabbles, or turf protection. Instead, it was a place where a spiritual emphasis took precedence over the world’s way of doing things.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
redundant.
1)tell me which man ruled church doesn’t think “spiritually”?
2) church or secular organizations are all top down rule so politicking and tussle for powers and money are generally inevitable.
3) spiritual emphasis is merely a means to an end which is…to be a god over the people( the SIN of nicolaitan)
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$For starters, our teaching needs to be biblically based and spiritually inclined. Our Sunday school classes, adult fellowships, and small-group instruction gatherings need to center on the teaching of the Bible and spiritual lessons. Our songs and our hymns should have spiritual content. Our counseling ministry needs to be derived from the Spirit’s revelation in the Scriptures. Our relationships with one another need to have spiritual priorities—intimate fellowship where people can trust one another. The church ought to be the one place where spiritual thinking overrides everything else—all those battles we fight within the marketplace. Why? Because Jesus Christ is the Head of the church. The church is a spiritual entity.$$$$$$$$$$$
redundant again.
tell me which church organization will admit to their church not being headed by jesus(proxy rule) or that they neglect to practice any of the above?
moral of the story?
one cannot sit on moses’s seat and not grow a forked tongue.
ps: all rule of laws come from the same source – religion. you want to trace its abuses you have to go back to its HYPOCRITICAL SOURCE!
October 29th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
forgot to add the link below
http://www.blogpastor.net/2009/10/chuck-swindoll-wary-of-corporatization-of-church/comment-page-1/#comment-669